Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40905425›Full record

ReviewJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG2025

Status quo and future developments in the diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema.

Andreas Recke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Status quo and future developments in the diagnosis and treatment of hereditary angioedema.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andreas ReckeDepartment of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Lübeck Campus, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7674-1804

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare hereditary disease characterized by edema, which can be life-threatening in case of swelling in the larynx. The most common form of HAE is caused by a mutation of the SERPING1 gene and is characterized by a deficiency (type I) or loss of function (type II) of the C1 inhibitor (C1-INH), leading to excessive production of bradykinin. In contrast, the HAE-nC1-INH entity is associated with a normal C1-INH protein and is caused by mutations in other genes. Because HAE is a rare and often underdiagnosed disease, it may take years from symptom onset to diagnosis. The angioedema attacks cause suffering and affect both the ability to work and quality of life (QoL). The treatment of HAE includes attack treatment (on-demand), short-term prophylaxis (e.g., before medical procedures), and long-term prophylaxis. Four first-line treatment options for long-term prophylaxis are available, effectively preventing attacks and supporting the guideline goal of complete disease control. Further treatment options, including CRISPR/Cas9-based gene therapy, are under development and promise to provide individually tailored treatment for patients. This review aims to provide an overview of the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of HAE.

Indexed as

Angioedemas, HereditaryComplement C1 Inhibitor ProteinForecastingGenetic TherapyHumansComplement C1 Inhibitor ProteinSERPING1 protein, humanBradykininC1 esterase inhibitorhereditary angioedemaprophylaxistherapy

Identifiers

PMID40905425
PMCPMC12697333

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.