Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Dan ZhangCharacteristic Laboratory of Forensic Science in the Universities of Shandong Province, Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan 250014, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8628-8444
Liangliang LiCharacteristic Laboratory of Forensic Science in the Universities of Shandong Province, Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan 250014, China.
Junchao MaCharacteristic Laboratory of Forensic Science in the Universities of Shandong Province, Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan 250014, China.
Jianfeng JinCollege of Life Sciences, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang 464000, China.
Chunli DingCharacteristic Laboratory of Forensic Science in the Universities of Shandong Province, Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan 250014, China.
Qiang FangCharacteristic Laboratory of Forensic Science in the Universities of Shandong Province, Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan 250014, China.
Jianjun JinCharacteristic Laboratory of Forensic Science in the Universities of Shandong Province, Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan 250014, China.
Zhulidezi AishanCollege of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China.
Xuebo LiCharacteristic Laboratory of Forensic Science in the Universities of Shandong Province, Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan 250014, China.
Funding
Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2023QH353
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
comparative genomicsforensic entomologygene family evolutiongenome annotation
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
A High-Quality Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Comparative Analyses Provide Insights into the Adaptation of · full record | Socratic