ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Age-related differences in switching highly effective disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Switching high efficacy therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Does real world experience support such a strategy?Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh efficacy therapies (HET) play a crucial role in multiple sclerosis (MS) management. HET discontinuation/de-escalation is a critical decision, especially in different age groups, due to potential changes in relapse rates. We aimed at evaluating the impact of HET discontinuation on annualized relapse rates (ARRs) in people with MS (pwMS) aged ≥ 50 or < 50 years.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data of 1,091 pwMS (German MS Register). ARR before and 12 months after the HET washout period were compared between older and younger patients for switching from HET to HET (H-H), HET to mild/moderate efficacy therapies (H-M) or HET to discontinuation (H-D). Reasons for therapy switches were assessed for all subgroups.
resultsMost treatment switches continued with another HET (H-H n = 786), while de-escalation (H-M n = 86) or discontinuation (H-D n = 219) occurred less frequently. The minority within each switching group were ≥ 50 years of age (H-H 29%, H-M 22%, H-D 32%). ARR in H-H decreased after switching in both age groups (< 50: 0.19-0.12; ≥ 50: 0.17 to 0.09), increased in H-M < 50 (0.13-0.63) and remained stable in ≥ 50 (0.11-0.08), and increased in H-D < 50 (0.05-0.13) and remained stable in ≥ 50 (0.14-0.11). Main reason for therapy switch was lack of efficacy in H-H, adverse events in H-M regardless of age, patient's choice (23%) in H-D < 50, and lack of efficacy (26%) in H-D ≥ 50.
conclusionsDiscontinuation strategies should be individualized, considering age-related changes in disease activity, adverse events and patient's choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40906181What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.