ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2025
[The potential of medical comics in rheumatology-Results of a standardized survey at the German Rheumatology Congress 2024].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComics are increasingly being discussed as an innovative means of communication in healthcare. In rheumatology there has so far been a lack of studies on the acceptance and potential use of medical comics. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to determine the acceptance of medical comics among rheumatologists and to evaluate their potential for use in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND
methodsAt the German Rheumatology Congress 2024 a total of 8 medical comics designed jointly in advance by patients and artists were exhibited. Congress participants were able to take part voluntarily and anonymously in a standardized online survey. Sociodemographic data, assessments of the comprehensibility and usefulness of the comics and their potential usability in everyday clinical practice were recorded.
resultsA total of 94 people took part in the survey, 58.5% of whom had a specialist medical qualification. The exhibition was rated with a Net Promoter Score of 37.2%. The understanding effect was rated at 6.3 ± 2.7 and the potential to promote public awareness at 8.4 ± 1.8 (scale 0-10). Of the participants 78.7% could imagine displaying the comics in their practice or clinic and 63.8% were in favor of their use for therapy and diagnosis clarification. DISCUSSION: The results show a high level of acceptance of comics among healthcare professionals and confirm their potential for use in education and communication. A structured further development of German language, medically validated comic formats appears to make sense.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40906187What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.