Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40906247›Full record

ReviewBioresources and bioprocessing2025

Heavy metals toxicity in plants: understanding mechanisms and developing coping strategies for remediation: a review.

Heba I Mohamed, Izhar Ullah, Muhammad Danish Toor, Nouraiz Ahmed Tanveer, Muhammad Mughees Ud Din, Abdul Basit, Yaqoob Sultan, Murad Muhammad, Muneeb Ur Rehman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exogenous hesperidin orchestrates antioxidant defense, osmolyte metabolism, and nutrient homeostasis to mitigate heavy metal toxicity in canola.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Heba I MohamedDepartment of Biological and Geological Sciences, Faculty of Education, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11341, Egypt. hebaibrahim79@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6892-3376
Izhar UllahDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Muhammad Danish ToorDepartment of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
Nouraiz Ahmed TanveerDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Muhammad Mughees Ud DinInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Abdul BasitDepartment of Horticulture Science, Kyungpook National University, 41566, Daegu, South Korea.
Yaqoob SultanDepartment of Grass Breeding, Institute of Agriculture, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, 58344, Kedainiu˛ r., Lithuania.
Murad MuhammadState Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, 830011, People's Republic of China.
Muneeb Ur RehmanDepartment of Agrochemistry and Soil Science, Faculty of Agronomy, Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heavy metal (HM) contamination is an increasing environmental and agricultural concern due to the persistence, toxicity, and bioaccumulative nature of metals such as cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), and arsenic (As). These pollutants are primarily introduced through industrial effluents, mining, and agrochemicals, negatively impacting soil health, crop productivity, and food safety, ultimately posing serious risks to both ecosystems and human health. Conventional remediation methods can be costly, labor-intensive, and environmentally disruptive. Heavy metals like Cd, Pb, Hg, and As disrupt cellular homeostasis, inhibit photosynthesis, generate oxidative stress, and interfere with nutrient uptake, leading to significant yield losses in plants. In response to these stresses, plants utilize complex molecular mechanisms for tolerance, including the activation of antioxidant enzymes, upregulation of metal transporters, production of metal-chelating molecules, and modulation of stress-responsive genes and transcription factors. In contrast, bioremediation offers a sustainable and eco-friendly alternative by leveraging the detoxification capabilities of plants, microbes, and their symbiotic interactions. Techniques such as phytoremediation, microbial-assisted remediation, and integrated strategies involving biochar and organic amendments have demonstrated promising results in restoring heavy metal-contaminated soils. Recent advancements in molecular biology and synthetic biology have further improved the efficiency of bioremediation through the genetic engineering of hyperaccumulator plant species and metal-resistant microbes. This review examines the toxic effects of heavy metals on plants and highlights innovative, nature-based remediation strategies, emphasizing their potential for scalable and sustainable environmental cleanup.

Indexed as

Heavy metalRemediation techniquesSoil health and ecosystemSustainable agriculture

Identifiers

PMID40906247
PMCPMC12411398

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.