ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Rethinking the definition of neonatal status epilepticus.
Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neonatal status epilepticus: critical issues in clinical practice.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neonatal status epilepticus (NSE) is associated with poor survival and adverse neurological outcomes. However, current definitions only partially account for the unique pathophysiology of the neonatal brain and the clinical context of acute symptomatic seizures. To address this gap, international efforts are underway to develop a more specific and context-appropriate definition for the neonatal period. While definite evidence in human newborns is still being gathered, we critically examine three conceptual approaches to defining NSE. We reviewed the relevant literature in order to discuss: 1) outcome-based definitions, 2) definitions based on the likelihood of spontaneous seizure termination, and 3) definitions guided by the decreasing probability of response to antiseizure medication.
conclusionsAlthough important knowledge gaps remain, emerging evidence is beginning to shape future directions in research and clinical care. A definition grounded in neonatal-specific mechanisms and clinical realities holds promise for improving neurodevelopmental outcomes in critically ill newborns. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Historical definition of neonatal status epilepticus (NSE) requires a single seizure (or recurrent seizures without return to baseline neurologic conditions) lasting ≥ 30 minutes. • With continuous monitoring, various definitions of a "high" seizure burden (SB) were preferentially used. WHAT IS NEW: • Evidence is being gathered for definitions based on declining probability of spontaneous seizure termination, on outcome, and on declining probability of drug response.. • Based on our literature review, we propose to consider any single seizure lasting 5 minutes as early NSE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40906263What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.