SynthesisJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2026
A Meta-Analysis of Sex-Based Differences in Health Service Use for Persons Living With Dementia Between 2018 and 2020 in Four Canadian Provinces.
Synthesis in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Meta-Analysis of Sex-Based Differences in Health Service Use for Persons Living With Dementia Between 2018 and 2020 in Four Canadian Provinces.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnsuring equitable healthcare services for persons with dementia is of utmost importance. Recent evidence points to sex-based differences in healthcare use in this population. However, available evidence is based on data from limited geographic regions and predates the COVID-19 pandemic, which is said to have further magnified disparities. This study aims to estimate sex-based differences in ambulatory and acute care service use in persons with dementia in four Canadian provinces between 2018 and 2020.
methodsA retrospective multicohort design was conducted using linked health administrative data from Quebec, Ontario, Alberta, and Saskatchewan. Three cohorts (2018, 2019, and 2020) of community-dwelling persons aged 65 and older with dementia were identified. Within each cohort, rates of sex-stratified outcomes were calculated (per 10,000 person-years). The outcomes were visits to family physicians, cognitive specialists, other specialists, all-cause emergency departments, and all-cause hospitalizations. Estimates of the incidence rate difference (IRD) between males and females within each cohort year for each outcome were pooled using random-effect meta-analysis.
resultsThe 2018, 2019, and 2020 cohorts included 97,811, 100,316, and 103,638 females, respectively. Similarly, 64,628, 67,013, and 69,839 males were included in the same respective cohorts. We found sex differences in ambulatory and acute care use in all three cohorts. Compared to females, males with dementia had higher rates of other specialists' visits, emergency department visits, and all-cause hospitalizations, with significant IRDs during the three cohort years.
conclusionConsistent sex differences in healthcare use by persons with dementia were observed before and during the pandemic in four Canadian provinces, especially in acute care. This emphasizes the need to address sex-based differences in dementia care, ultimately working toward ensuring equitable and tailored healthcare services to enhance the quality of care and experiences for all persons with dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.