ArticleDermatology and therapy2025
Strategies for Optimal Use of Biological Therapies in Managing Psoriasis: Focus on Secukinumab.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPsoriasis (PsO) is a common inflammatory dermatological condition with a substantial negative impact on patient quality of life. Several biological agents are available for the treatment of PsO, and clinicians and patients must consider various factors when deciding on the most appropriate biological agent.
methodsHere, we report a set of consensus statements developed by an Italian PsO advisory board on use of the anti-interleukin-17A biological secukinumab in routine clinical practice.
resultsThe statements were developed under three main topics, the first of which was "characteristics of secukinumab and criteria for patient selection to achieve long-term benefits". This statement helps to identify patients most likely to benefit from secukinumab, including biological-naïve patients with moderate PsO; patients with PsO involving sensitive sites; patients in whom biosimilar anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha treatment has proved ineffective; patients at high risk of developing psoriatic arthritis; lean or normal-weight patients; patients with active disease receiving conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs; and patients with comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease. Under the second topic, "strategies to maintain secukinumab effectiveness in the long term", the advisors highlighted the importance of patient support to promote adherence; weight control; understanding that PsO can worsen for reasons unrelated to treatment; and understanding that appropriate treatment should depend on the severity of any disease worsening. The third topic, "strategies for patient support to promote adherence to therapy", noted the importance of patient education, accurate disease assessments and treatment tailoring.
conclusionThese consensus statements will help guide dermatologists in the selection of patients with PsO for whom secukinumab is the most appropriate treatment in real-world clinical practice in Italy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.