Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40906807›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

A general genome editing strategy using CRISPR lipid nanoparticle spherical nucleic acids.

Zhenyu Han, Chi Huang, Taokun Luo, Chad A Mirkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hypothalamic wars: the last nanodelivery.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inverse Design of DNA-Programmable Protein Colloidal Crystals.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Expanding the CRISPR/Cas toolkit: applications in proteomics and theranostics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhenyu Han *Department of Chemistry and International Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.ORCID 0000-0003-3798-9345
Chi Huang *Department of Chemistry and International Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.ORCID 0000-0002-4467-9073
Taokun LuoDepartment of Chemistry and International Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Chad A MirkinDepartment of Chemistry and International Institute for Nanotechnology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.ORCID 0000-0002-6634-7627

Funding

DOD | AF | AMC | AFRL | Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) FA9550-22-1-0300National Science Foundation (NSF) DMR-2308691National Science Foundation (NSF) DMR-2428112National Science Foundation (NSF) NSF ECCS-2025633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas systems hold promise for treating a wide range of genetic disorders and cancers. However, efficient delivery of genome editors remains challenging due to the requirement for the simultaneous delivery or intracellular generation of Cas proteins, guide RNAs, and, in some applications, donor DNAs. Furthermore, the immunogenicity and toxicity of delivery vehicles can limit the safety and efficacy of genetic medicines. Here, we combine two nucleic acid delivery approaches to create CRISPR lipid nanoparticle-spherical nucleic acids (LNP-SNAs) that are both efficient and biocompatible. Compared to lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) lacking a surface-bound DNA shell, CRISPR LNP-SNAs exhibit two- to three-fold higher cellular uptake, reduced cytotoxicity, and improved gene transfection efficiency. Across multiple cell lines and genomic loci, CRISPR LNP-SNAs induce insertion-deletion mutations at average frequencies two- to three-fold higher than those observed with LNPs. When codelivered with donor templates, CRISPR LNP-SNAs enable homology-directed repair at an average efficiency of 21 ± 7%, a 2.5-fold improvement over LNPs (8 ± 4%). The ease of synthesis and biocompatibility of CRISPR LNP-SNAs highlight their potential as a versatile delivery platform for CRISPR-Cas and other gene therapies.

Indexed as

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingLipidsNanoparticlesNucleic AcidsHEK293 CellsHumansLiposomesRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsTransfectionLipid NanoparticlesLipidsLiposomesNucleic AcidsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCRISPRgenome editinglipid nanoparticlerepair templatespherical nucleic acid

Identifiers

PMID40906807
PMCPMC12435252

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.