ArticleVeterinary journal (London, England : 1997)2025
The predictive ability of blood-based biomarkers to detect bacteremia in hospitalized neonatal foals.
Article in Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early and accurate identification of septicemia in neonatal foals improves survival. In human medicine, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio (NMR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) aid in early bacteremia detection. This study evaluated the diagnostic utility of these markers in conjunction with other clinical and hematological parameters in hospitalized foals < 5 days old to predict positive blood culture at admission and to distinguish between Gram-positive, Gram-negative, or polymicrobial bacteremia. A total of 391 foals with a complete blood count and aseptically obtained blood culture at admission were included. Physical exam and hematologic parameters, including white blood cell count (WBC) and immunoglobulin G (IgG), were incorporated into logistic regression models, with the area under the curve (AUC) used to assess predictive performance. Plasma cfDNA was measured via fluorometry. We found that plasma cfDNA, IgG, NLR, and WBC were independent predictors of bacteremia, and a composite model demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability to identify foals with a positive blood culture (AUC = 0.806). Additionally, plasma cfDNA, IgG, and neutrophil counts were independent predictors of Gram-negative bacteremia, and a composite model demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.807), and monocyte count and age predicted Gram-positive bacteremia with a composite model that demonstrated fair discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.67). Our findings demonstrate that NLR and plasma cfDNA are significantly altered in bacteremic foals. whereas the NMR and MLR do not differ significantly between groups. Combining these markers with other clinicopathologic variables may enable early identification and timely intervention in affected foals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.