ArticleThe New phytologist2025
High-frequency sampling unveils biotic and abiotic drivers of rapid phytoplankton morphological changes.
Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global dataset of soil eukaryotic communities created with a uniform protocol and long read sequencing.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Diversity of silica-scaled chrysophytes (Chrysophyceae) from Mindanao Island (Philippines) with the description ofPhytoKeys · 2025Article
- A revision of thePhytoKeys · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phytoplankton, as primary producers, play a key role in aquatic ecosystems. Their community turnover is shaped by morphological traits that enable adaptation to diverse abiotic and biotic factors. Yet, the temporal scale of these dynamics remains poorly understood due to limited high-frequency sampling studies. Employing DNA metabarcoding, we assessed the community composition of the phytoplankton lineage Synurales (Chrysophyceae) at 3-d intervals during 70 d at a shallow peat bog lake in the Czech Republic. The selected group possesses a variety of species-specific key morphological traits, such as cell size, coloniality, and bristle formation. Using a custom reference database of cultured species, we assigned 99.93% of eDNA reads to 74 species-level lineages with known morphological traits. Community changes in colonial species were influenced by abiotic drivers such as silica concentration and wind speed. By contrast, shifts in unicellular species communities were mainly driven by Cladocera predators, influencing the occurrence of bristle-bearing species. Changes in species composition and morphological traits occurred within days, mirroring environmental variability. Achieving such fine-scale resolution, especially for small or rare taxa, would be extremely difficult using microscopy alone. eDNA enabled high-resolution community profiling and abundance estimation, demonstrating its key role and the importance of comprehensive reference databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.