ReviewFEBS open bio2025
Stromagenesis and cancer-associated fibroblast heterogeneity in primary tumors and metastasis: focus in non-small cell lung cancer.
Review in FEBS open bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioprinted Tumor Microenvironment Models Reveal Immune Evasion and Guide CAR-NK Therapeutic Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Mutational Landscape and Treatment Response in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Real-World Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Antagonistic SMAD2/3 control of TIMP-1, VEGF-A, and hypoxia signaling in myofibroblasts shapes histotype-specific angiogenesis in lung cancer.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- A step further in our commitment to support early career researchers (ECRs).FEBS open bio · 2026Article
- Decoding tumor-stroma interactions: from molecular crosstalk to therapeutic targets.FEBS open bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common lung cancer type and one of the deadliest neoplasias worldwide. NSCLC is histologically classified into adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and other less frequent subtypes. Both subtypes and other solid tumors are increasingly regarded as abnormal organs, highlighting the critical role of the desmoplastic tumor stroma rich in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in driving tumor progression and therapeutic resistance. This tumor stroma resembles a chronic fibrotic wound and is largely formed by activated/myofibroblast-like α-SMA+ CAFs (myCAFs), which are strongly associated with immunosuppression and poor prognosis. Despite the dominance of the myCAF phenotype, we reported a decade ago phenotypic alterations in NSCLC with a strong dependence on the histologic subtype. Subsequent studies using functional assays, single-cell techniques, and in vivo models have refined these initial observations, enhancing our understanding of the biology of both normal fibroblasts/myofibroblasts and CAFs in NSCLC and other cancer types, including their origins, subclassification, and physiopathologic functions. Notably, increasing evidence supports that CAFs can exhibit tumor-restraining or tumor-promoting effects, and current therapeutic efforts aim to shift the balance towards tumor-restraining phenotypes. Here, we review major advances in our understanding of tumor stromagenesis and CAF heterogeneity in both primary tumors and metastasis, including emerging consensus, with a special focus on NSCLC and its frequent dissemination to the brain. We also highlight the critical role of smoking through epigenetic reprogramming of the TGF-β/SMAD3 pathway. These advances are beginning to delineate how CAF heterogeneity depends on the stage and histologic subtype in NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.