Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40909061›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Exploring Gender Differences in Social Support in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Review.

Laura E Marchwinski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Laura E MarchwinskiHuman Movement Science, Oakland University, Rochester, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This comprehensive narrative review examines how social support influences participation in Phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation (CR2), a commonly structured 12-week outpatient program focused on supervised exercise, education, and lifestyle change. Literature published between 2005 and the present was reviewed across four databases, resulting in four studies that met the inclusion criteria. Social support was described across three dimensions (emotional, informational, and practical) to explore how these forms of support intersect with gender‑related patterns in health behaviors, coping, and engagement in CR2. Key findings indicated that women tend to rely more on emotional support, while men often benefit from practical assistance. Non‑traditional support networks, such as neighbors and volunteers, were also found to facilitate participation for both genders. These insights highlight the need for gender‑sensitive CR2 programming and policies to strengthen support systems, address disparities in involvement, and improve long‑term recovery outcomes.

Indexed as

cardiac rehabilitation (cr)gender-differencesphase 2 cardiac rehabilitation (cr2)program completionsocial support intervention

Identifiers

PMID40909061
PMCPMC12406962

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.