ReviewCureus2025
Exploring Gender Differences in Social Support in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This comprehensive narrative review examines how social support influences participation in Phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation (CR2), a commonly structured 12-week outpatient program focused on supervised exercise, education, and lifestyle change. Literature published between 2005 and the present was reviewed across four databases, resulting in four studies that met the inclusion criteria. Social support was described across three dimensions (emotional, informational, and practical) to explore how these forms of support intersect with gender‑related patterns in health behaviors, coping, and engagement in CR2. Key findings indicated that women tend to rely more on emotional support, while men often benefit from practical assistance. Non‑traditional support networks, such as neighbors and volunteers, were also found to facilitate participation for both genders. These insights highlight the need for gender‑sensitive CR2 programming and policies to strengthen support systems, address disparities in involvement, and improve long‑term recovery outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.