ReviewCureus2025
Unlocking the Potential of Nutraceuticals in Cancer Chemotherapy: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutraceuticals in Uro-Oncology: A Structured Expert Review and Precision-Oriented Framework.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Future Perspectives: Mass Spectrometry for Spatial Localisation of Anti-Angiogenic Oil Palm Compounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Turkish Hazelnut Extracts Exert Anti-Proliferative and Anti-Cancer Effects on Colorectal Cancer HCT-116 Cells.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Nutraceutical formulations and natural compounds for the management of chronic diseases.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer remains a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. While conventional therapies such as chemotherapy and radiation are essential, growing evidence supports the adjunctive use of nutraceuticals-bioactive compounds from natural food sources-with anticancer potential. To synthesize current evidence on the mechanisms, therapeutic roles, and clinical challenges of nutraceuticals in cancer chemotherapy. A narrative review was conducted by searching literature from 2015 to 2024 across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies were included based on relevance to cancer patients, nutraceutical interventions, and reported therapeutic or supportive outcomes. No formal meta-analysis was performed; findings were thematically grouped and summarized. Nutraceuticals such as curcumin, resveratrol, flavonoids, and vitamins D and E exert antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, pro-apoptotic, and immune-modulatory effects. Many demonstrate synergy with chemotherapy, enhancing efficacy and reducing toxicity. Probiotics and omega-3 fatty acids, in particular, show promise in alleviating chemotherapy-induced side effects. However, clinical utility is limited by inconsistent trial results, variable dosing, low bioavailability, and lack of regulatory oversight. Some supplements may interfere with standard therapies or pose safety concerns if used indiscriminately. Nutraceuticals offer promising adjunctive benefits in cancer care, but their integration requires cautious, evidence-based application. Standardized formulations, better clinical trial designs, and regulatory clarity are needed to ensure their safe and effective use in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.