Evidence mapPaperPMID 40909148Full record

ArticleCannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)2025

Developing a Mock Retail Cannabis Shop for Research: A Description of The CANNEX.

Eric R Pedersen, Mark A Prince, Ireland M Shute, Megan E Brown, Bethany Gray, Keegan D Buch, John Monterosso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eric R PedersenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.
Mark A PrinceDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.
Ireland M ShuteDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.
Megan E BrownDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.
Bethany GrayDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University.
Keegan D BuchDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California.
John MonterossoInstitute for Addiction Science, University of Southern California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Cannabis retail dispensaries have proliferated in the United States in recent years, making it an important time for conducting research. Research is needed to learn more about consumer purchasing behaviors, including the impact of product marketing both inside and outside of retail spaces, and studies are needed to explore how both consumers and retail staff interpret the health benefits and potential risks associated with cannabis products within these environments. Current research on cannabis dispensaries often involves surveys or interviews with customers and dispensary staff outside of dispensary environments, but much can be learned through observational and experimental methods within dispensaries themselves. However, researchers have traditionally relied on surveillance methods, where researchers visit dispensaries to gain a deeper understanding of real-world encounters in these environments. Although these methods provide helpful insights into purchasing and selling behavior, as well as regulatory compliance, these studies are conducted in an uncontrolled environment, as products, messaging, and interactions are specific to the dispensaries in which the research is conducted. Method: We therefore created a mock cannabis dispensary to offer participants a retail experience that can be controlled and manipulated (e.g., adjustable cannabis product prices, placement of health and risk information in the dispensary, scripted interactions with dispensary staff) to help balance ecological and internal validity and answer questions about purchasing and selling behavior beyond what current methods allow. Results: We describe the process of developing and stocking the first known mock cannabis dispensary for research purposes, the Cannabis Annex ("The CANNEX"), including interior design, product selection, feedback solicitation from 20 cannabis industry workers, and plans for future research studies within the environment. Conclusions: By describing our process, we hope to aid researchers in developing their own similar mock dispensaries to continue learning about the health benefits, risks from use, and policy implications of cannabis in an increasingly legal recreational atmosphere.

Indexed as

budtenderscannabis retailersdispensarymarijuana

Identifiers

PMID40909148
PMCPMC12406238

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.