Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40909176›Full record

ReviewVascular health and risk management2025

Deep Learning-Based Detection of Arrhythmia Using ECG Signals - A Comprehensive Review.

Aquib Irteza Reshad, Valentina Nino, Maria Valero

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aquib Irteza ReshadDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, GA, USA.
Valentina NinoDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, GA, USA.
Maria ValeroDepartment of Information Technology, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac arrhythmias are a major health concern around the world, causing morbidity and mortality in a wide range of people. The timely and accurate diagnosis of arrhythmias is critical for optimal clinical management and intervention. Deep learning techniques have developed as powerful tools for detecting arrhythmias in recent years, taking advantage of advances in signal processing and machine learning. This review investigates the use of deep learning approaches to detect arrhythmias via electrocardiogram (ECG) readings. The study includes an in-depth evaluation of 30 papers retrieved from three distinct databases using a structured method. The result indicates that deep learning models can achieve high accuracy like 99.93% as well as high F1 scores such as 99.57%. Furthermore, the study examines current research trends, approaches, and developments in deep learning-based arrhythmia detection, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and hybrid architectures that includes RNN and CNN algorithms. Additionally, the paper investigates the strengths and limits of existing techniques, focusing on critical issues such as dataset heterogeneity, model interpretability, and real-time implementation. Future research and development directions in arrhythmia detection using deep learning are also mentioned. This study seeks to give significant insights for physicians, researchers, and policymakers involved in the development and implementation of sophisticated arrhythmia detection systems, with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes and cardiac healthcare.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsArrhythmias, CardiacDeep LearningDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectrocardiographyHeart RateSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisReproducibility of Resultscardiac arrhythmiaconvolutional neural networkselectrocardiogramheart disease detectionhybrid architectureirregular heartbeat

Identifiers

PMID40909176
PMCPMC12406999

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.