ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Constructing the optimal experimental autoimmune thyroiditis mouse model using porcine thyroglobulin.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Commentary: Constructing the optimal experimental autoimmune thyroiditis mouse model using porcine thyroglobulin.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Autoimmune thyroiditis (AIT) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by lymphocytic infiltration of the thyroid gland and elevated specific antibodies. Its incidence rises annually, yet no standardized animal model fully mimics human AIT. Given unclear pathogenesis and lack of targeted immunotherapies, researchers invest significant time in developing suitable models. This study systematically compares pathological and immunological effects of different immunization conditions (antigen dose, frequency, administration methods) in NOD/LtJ mice to establish an optimal model for elucidating AIT pathogenesis and therapies. Methods: Eighty female NOD/LtJ mice were divided into subcutaneous (SC) and tail vein intravenous (IV) injection groups. SC groups received porcine thyroglobulin (pTg) emulsified in CFA (primary) and IFA (booster), with doses of 50/100/200 μg and frequencies of 2 or 3 immunizations. IV groups received pTg in PBS followed by LPS (3 immunizations: weeks 1, 3, 4). All model groups drank 0.05% NaI water. Thyroid histopathology (HE staining, infiltration scoring), serum TPO-Ab/TG-Ab (ELISA), cytokines (multiplex assay), Th17/Treg cells (multiplex immunofluorescence), and thyroid IL-17A/NLRP3/Caspase-1 (immunohistochemistry) were analyzed 2 weeks post-last immunization. Results: High-dose antigen (200 μg pTg) with high-frequency immunization (three times) via SC or IV routes induced severe thyroid lymphocyte infiltration (scores: SC 3.4±0.55, IV 3.2±0.45; p<0.01 vs. controls), follicular destruction, and elevated serum antibodies (TPO-Ab: IV 438.8±13.15 > SC 406.2±7.46; TG-Ab: IV 158.4±5.32 > SC 141.9±2.36). This protocol activated Th1/Th17 cytokines (IL-17A, IL-6, TNF-α), increased Treg cells (p<0.001), and specifically enhanced NLRP3 (p<0.001) and Caspase-1 in thyroid tissue, with IV injection showing superior antibody production and inflammasome activation. Discussion: The combination of high-dose pTg (200 μg) and three immunizations maximally induced AIT pathology and immune responses in NOD/LtJ mice. Tail vein injection excelled in stimulating antibody production and NLRP3 activation, while subcutaneous injection promoted stronger histological inflammation. After balancing operational feasibility, pathological reproducibility, and immunological specificity, three subcutaneous and intravenous tail injection of 200 μg pTg are recommended as the optimal modeling protocol. This approach accelerates model selection, improves experimental efficiency, and reduces animal use, providing a robust foundation for AIT research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.