Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40909436›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Psychology2024

Determinants of behaviour and their efficacy as targets of behavioural change interventions.

Dolores Albarracín, Bita Fayaz-Farkhad, Javier A Granados Samayoa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Intervention Using Video and Comic Books Targeting Nutritional Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. CanRestoreFunction: Cancer-related fatigue management eHealth intervention- a pilot pragmatic randomized-control trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dolores AlbarracínDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9878-942X
Bita Fayaz-FarkhadAnnenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Javier A Granados SamayoaDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Digital, Community-Led, Social Action Initiative to Reduce Opioid Vulnerability and HIV/HCV in Rural Areas of the Midwest and AppalachiaDP1DA048570 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 2019 to 2023
$4.0M
Understanding the Regional Ecology of a Future HIV VaccineR01MH132415 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DOLORES ALBARRACIN · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
Mining Social Media Messages for HIV Testing and Prevention CommunicationR01MH114847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
Development and validation of regional models of HIV vulnerabilities and solutionsR01AI147487 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 2019 to 2022
$2.4M
Efficacy and Effectiveness of Multi-Behavior Interventions Relevant to HIVR01MH094241 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
Behavior Change Theory to HIV PreventionK02MH075616 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI ALBARRACIN, DOLORES · 2005 to 2009
$641k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI147487NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA048570NIMH NIH HHS K02 MH075616NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094241NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH114847NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH132415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unprecedented social, environmental, political and economic challenges - such as pandemics and epidemics, environmental degradation and community violence - require taking stock of how to promote behaviours that benefit individuals and society at large. In this Review, we synthesize multidisciplinary meta-analyses of the individual and social-structural determinants of behaviour (for example, beliefs and norms, respectively) and the efficacy of behavioural change interventions that target them. We find that, across domains, interventions designed to change individual determinants can be ordered by increasing impact as those targeting knowledge, general skills, general attitudes, beliefs, emotions, behavioural skills, behavioural attitudes and habits. Interventions designed to change social-structural determinants can be ordered by increasing impact as legal and administrative sanctions; programmes that increase institutional trustworthiness; interventions to change injunctive norms; monitors and reminders; descriptive norm interventions; material incentives; social support provision; and policies that increase access to a particular behaviour. We find similar patterns for health and environmental behavioural change specifically. Thus, policymakers should focus on interventions that enable individuals to circumvent obstacles to enacting desirable behaviours rather than targeting salient but ineffective determinants of behaviour such as knowledge and beliefs.

Identifiers

PMID40909436
PMCPMC12407158

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.