ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Large-scale comparative analysis reveals top graph signal processing features for subject identification.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In magnetic resonance imaging, graph signal processing (GSP) is an analytical framework that enables to express regional functional activity time courses in terms of the underlying structural connectivity backbone. To this end, several parameters must be set during the processing of structural and functional data, and a variety of output features have been proposed. While emerging applications of the GSP framework have shown clear merits to reveal the neural underpinnings of brain disorders, behavioural facets or individuality, at present, the optimal parameter choices and feature types for an outcome of interest remain unknown. Here, we fill this gap by conducting a large-scale comparative analysis across parameter choices and candidate feature types. First, we show that all the studied factors of variation within the GSP pipeline significantly modulate feature vector patterns and feature coefficient values, evidencing the importance of an exhaustive characterization. Second, focusing on the ability to fingerprint individual subjects, we demonstrate that power spectral density and the structural decoupling index are the most all-around feature types, which harmoniously balance robustness to external sources of variation (head movement and acquisition settings), parsimony of the telling feature set, and generalization to altered parcellation specificities. Our results emphasize the importance, for future GSP studies, of carefully considering the undertaken structural connectivity and functional parameter choices as a function of the outcome measure of interest. More globally, they also highlight the relevance of large-scale comparative strategies in optimizing an analytical pipeline towards a specific goal. Our reported methodology can seamlessly be extended to other analytical approaches and outcome measures of interest, which we hope will be of use for future researchers in and outside the GSP subfield.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.