ArticleResearch square2025
Neuroanatomy Reflects Individual Variability in Impulsivity in Youth.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individual differences in neural circuits underlying emotional regulation, motivation, and decision-making are implicated in many psychiatric illnesses. Interindividual variability in these circuits may manifest, at least in part, as individual differences in impulsivity at both normative and clinically significant levels. Impulsivity reflects a tendency towards rapid, unplanned reactions to internal or external stimuli without considering potential negative consequences coupled with difficulty inhibiting responses. Here, we use multivariate brain-based predictive models to explore the neural bases of impulsivity across multiple behavioral scales, neuroanatomical features (cortical thickness, surface area, and gray matter volume), and sexes (females and males) in a large sample of youth from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study at baseline (n = 9,099) and two-year follow-up (n = 6,432). Impulsivity is significantly associated with neuroanatomical variability, and these associations vary across behavioral scales and neuroanatomical features. Impulsivity broadly maps onto cortical thickness in dispersed regions (e.g., inferior frontal, lateral occipital, superior frontal, entorhinal), as well as surface area and gray matter volume in specific medial (e.g., parahippocampal, cingulate) and polar (e.g., frontal and temporal) territories. Importantly, while many relationships are stable across sexes, others are sex-specific. These results highlight the complexity of the relationships between neuroanatomy and impulsivity across scales, features, sexes, and time points in youth. These findings suggest that neuroanatomy, in combination with other biological and environmental factors, reflects a key driver of individual differences in impulsivity in youth. As such, neuroanatomical markers may help identify youth at increased risk for developing impulsivity-related illnesses. Furthermore, this work emphasizes the importance of adopting a multidimensional and sex-specific approach in neuroimaging and behavioral research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.