Trial reportPharmacotherapy2025
A Multicenter, Open-Label Study to Assess the Safety of Nebulized Tissue Plasminogen Activator for the Acute Treatment of Pediatric Plastic Bronchitis: The PLATyPuS Trial.
Trial report in Pharmacotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02315898 (Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled Tissue Plasminogen Activator), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled Tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) for the Acute Treatment of Pediatric Plastic Bronchitis
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A literature review: progress in the study of plastic bronchitis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPediatric plastic bronchitis (PB) is a rare complication of surgically palliated congenital heart disease (CHD). Fibrin casts obstruct airways and can cause respiratory distress. There are no therapeutics approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to treat PB, but inhaled tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) has been anecdotally used to relieve symptoms. We conducted a phase II open-label clinical trial to test the safety of inhaled tPA in pediatric PB.
methodsPatients with an acute exacerbation of PB requiring hospitalization were enrolled to test the safety of an inhaled tPA regimen (5 mg every 6 h). The primary end point was to assess the safety and tolerability of repeated doses of nebulized, inhaled tPA in pediatric patients with acute PB. Safety parameters consisted of clinical laboratories to assess bleeding, which were measured prior to, during, and after tPA treatment. To benchmark efficacy using spirometry and oxygen saturation, children with Fontan-palliated CHD without a history of PB, with and without protein losing enteropathy (PLE), and healthy children were enrolled in a control arm that did not receive tPA.
resultsOf the 10 patients with PB screened for enrollment, eight qualified for immediate treatment with inhaled tPA. A total of 29 non-PB participants (PLE, n = 8 [10-18 yo]; CHD, n = 9 [8-17 yo]; and healthy, n = 12 [7-16 yo]) were enrolled. There were no differences in pretreatment clinical blood laboratory values of hemostasis and those during and after treatment with the study drug (primary safety outcome). However, there were four episodes of self-limiting epistaxis related to the study drug. Inhaled tPA statistically improved oxygen saturation although this was moderate and likely not clinically significant; inhaled tPA did not alter spirometry values.
conclusionIn this small, phase II study, repeated doses of inhaled tPA in patients with an acute exacerbation of PB did not result in disrupted systemic coagulation or hematological homeostasis or serious bleeding. However, patients should be monitored for localized bleeding. Larger, randomized trials are needed to provide more comprehensive assessments of bleeding risk and to further assess efficacy.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02315898.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.