ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026
Identifying Latent Classes of Dual Cigarette/ENDS Users Based on Motivations for ENDS Use: Product Substitution Versus Complementary Use.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study was to empirically identify subgroups of dual cigarette and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) product users based on their motivations for ENDS use.
methodsData came from n = 713 adult dual cigarette/ENDS users in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Wave 6 public use data file. We used latent class analysis to identify qualitatively different subgroups within the sample and applied logistic regression to assess correlates of latent class membership.
resultsWe identified two latent classes: "Substituters" (62.81%) and Complementers (37.19%). Classes were primarily distinguished by Substituters reporting a higher probability of using ENDS to cut down on (97.99%) or quit (86.12%) cigarette smoking; the converse was true for Complementers (16.95%; 3.17%, respectively). Compared to Substituters, Complementers (aOR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.96) expressed less interest in smoking cessation. Moreover, Complementers were less likely to have made a past-year smoking quit attempt (aOR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.27 to 0.77) and more likely to smoke the same number of cigarettes as usual (aOR = 3.62, 95% CI = 2.04 to 6.42) or more cigarettes than usual (aOR = 5.96, 95% CI = 1.92 to 18.51) on days when they both smoked and vaped than were Substituters. No sociodemographic differences were observed.
conclusionsWe identified distinct latent classes of dual cigarette/ENDS users, predominantly differentiated based on their reported probabilities of using ENDS to assist in quitting or cutting down on cigarette smoking. Findings that class membership is associated with interest in quitting and quit attempts have significant health, treatment, and study design implications. IMPLICATIONS: The identification of distinct classes of dual cigarette/ENDS users based on their motivations for ENDS use and differential associations between class membership and tobacco use characteristics has a number of implications. Class membership may affect cessation treatment approaches and has significant implications for scientific study design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.