ArticleJournal of neurology2025
Association between weekend recovery sleep and risk of incident dementia: a prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI and Wearables for Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic Review on the Association Between Sleep and the Risk of Alzheimer's Disease: An Evolutionary Perspective.Evolutionary applications · 2026Review
- Dietary B-complex vitamins and sleep quality in relation to cognitive impairment among older adults: non-linear associations and evidence of additive interaction.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSleep deprivation has been linked to higher dementia risk, but the role of weekend recovery sleep (WRS) in mitigating this risk remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the association between WRS and dementia risk.
methodsThis prospective cohort study followed 88,592 dementia-free adults aged 40-79 years from the UK Biobank, using wrist accelerometers to measure average weekday and weekend sleep durations. Incident dementia (all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease [AD], vascular dementia [VaD], and nonspecific dementia) was determined using medical records. Associations were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic splines (RCS).
resultsAmong 88,592 participants (mean [SD] age, 61.9 [7.9] years), 735 (0.83%) developed dementia, including 308 (0.35%) cases of AD, 137 (0.15%) cases of VaD, and 319 (0.36%) cases of nonspecific dementia. RCS analyses revealed optimal weekday sleep durations associated with the lowest dementia risk: 8.38 h (HR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.64-0.84) for all-cause dementia, 8.33 h (HR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.58-0.89) for AD, and 9.07 h (HR, 0.59; 95% CI 0.40-0.88) for VaD. In the suboptimal sleep group (weekday sleep less than optimal duration), longer WRS was associated with reduced risks of all-cause dementia (HR, 0.801; 95% CI 0.717-0.893) and VaD (HR, 0.747; 95% CI 0.612-0.91). However, in the prolonged sleep group (weekday sleep exceeding optimal duration), longer WRS was linked to an increased nonspecific dementia risk (HR, 1.291; 95% CI 1.087-1.533).
conclusionAdequate WRS can reduce dementia risk, particularly for VaD, after insufficient weekday sleep, highlighting the importance of appropriate WRS for cognitive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40911069What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.