ArticleInternational journal of older people nursing2025
One Chance to Get it Right: Exploring Perspectives and Experiences in Care Home Discharge Decision-Making in the Acute Hospital.
Article in International journal of older people nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- One Chance to Get it Right: Exploring Perspectives and Experiences in Care Home Discharge Decision-Making in the Acute Hospital.International journal of older people nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDischarge from acute hospital to new care home is a complex and life changing process often involving several key stakeholders in decision-making such as the older person, their significant person and members of the multidisciplinary team. There is limited research exploring the perspectives of these stakeholders, including factors that influence decision-making and how this is communicated.
objectiveThis study explored how decisions are made to discharge older people directly from hospital to care home, considering the perspectives and experiences of those involved.
methodsA case study design was used to explore the experiences of six older people admitted to acute hospital from home for whom discharge to care home was planned. Six datasets were formed, each comprising semi-structured interviews with the person, their significant person(s) (if applicable), multi-disciplinary professionals and review of health and social-work records. Datasets were analysed using an inductive thematic approach before cross-dataset analysis.
resultsFindings emphasised the complex and personal nature of decision-making. The older person was often keen to talk about their decision. Significant people highlighted the complexity of balancing risk and care needs. However, the magnitude of the decision to older people and their significant persons appeared to go underacknowledged by professionals. The hospital context was significant as a location for decision-making. Communication was integral to the experiences of those involved; however, uncertainty and lack of role clarity impacted this.
conclusionsThis study offers new insights into the complexity of discharge to care home from hospital. This life-changing decision requires greater recognition by professionals. Improved understanding of the process and well-developed communication is central to enhancing the experience for those involved. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The significance of this oftentimes final decision should not be underestimated. The findings indicate a clear need for interdisciplinary education about care home discharge, and the importance of professionals' availability and approachability throughout decision-making. Professionals are encouraged to recognise a shared responsibility for the provision of information and guidance, and create opportunities for open and supportive conversations with older people and their families to explore the decision and discuss their feelings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.