ArticlePloS one2025
Vascular imbalance in polycystic ovary syndrome: Insights into endothelial dysfunction.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Association Between Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Markers of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Premenopausal Women: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Bridging the Practice Gap: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome as an Under-Recognised Risk State for Ischaemic Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Neutrophils and NETosis in polycystic ovary syndrome: unraveling the immuno-metabolic thromboinflammatory axis.European journal of medical research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a multifactorial endocrine disorder associated with vascular dysfunction and increased cardiovascular risk. This study aims to investigate the dysregulation of vascular tone in PCOS, focusing on the imbalance between vasodilators (nitric oxide [NO] and apelin) and vasoconstrictors (noradrenaline and reduced prostacyclin). By examining these factors, the study seeks to elucidate their contribution to endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular complications in PCOS patients. Forty-four patients diagnosed with PCOS according to the 2003 Rotterdam Criteria, along with 44 healthy controls, were included in the study. Ultrasound evaluations were performed on all volunteers. Serum NO, apelin, noradrenaline, and prostacyclin levels were measured using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Additionally, routine biochemical, hormonal, and glycated hemoglobin analyses were conducted on all samples. There was no statistically significant difference between the PCOS and control groups in terms of marital status, age, and body mass index (BMI) (p > 0.05). Compared to the control group (83.85 ± 22.65 µmol/L, 190.88 ± 16.44 ng/L, and 24.63 ± 4.59 ng/L, respectively), NO, apelin, and noradrenaline concentrations were significantly higher in patients with PCOS (104.35 ± 44.96 µmol/L, 379.57 ± 40.11 ng/L, and 27.48 ± 5.36 ng/L, respectively) (p < 0.01). In contrast, prostacyclin concentrations were significantly lower in patients with PCOS (5.85 ± 1.28 ng/L) compared to the control group (6.78 ± 1.99 ng/L) (p = 0.011). Additionally, a statistically significant difference was found between the PCOS and control groups in FSH, LH, testosterone, SHBG, glucose, and HDL levels (p < 0.05). The disrupted balance between vasodilation and vasoconstriction in PCOS, driven by altered levels of NO, apelin, noradrenaline, and prostacyclin, contributes to endothelial dysfunction and increased cardiovascular risk. These molecular disturbances underline the need for targeted therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring vascular homeostasis in PCOS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.