ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025
Erectile dysfunction among the young male population: A cross-sectional study.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of male sexual dysfunction in a population of young men using validated tools to evaluate erectile function and its contributing factors.MethodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted between April 2023 and August 2024 among married men aged ≤40 years in Saudi Arabia. Participants were randomly selected from public gatherings across five regions and interviewed using the International Index of Erectile Function and Sexual Health Inventory for Men. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected, including comorbidities, body mass index, physical activity, income, educational level, job, and depression screening result. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, nonparametric tests, and multivariable linear regression to identify factors associated with erectile dysfunction.ResultsA total of 196 men participated in the study. Of these, 77 (39.2%) were diagnosed with erectile dysfunction. According to the Sexual Health Inventory for Men score categories, 119 (60.7%) men had no significant erectile dysfunction, 29 (14.8%) had mild erectile dysfunction, 19 (9.7%) had mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction, 15 (7.6%) had moderate erectile dysfunction, and 14 (7.14%) had severe erectile dysfunction. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed several significant associated factors for better erectile function (based on the International Index of Erectile Function score), namely, higher income and an initial negative screening result for depression. The International Index of Erectile Function score was 12.65 points (95% confidence interval: -17.37 to -7.92; p < 0.0001) lower in participants with an initial positive screening result for depression than in those with an initial negative screening result for depression.ConclusionsThese results suggest that sexual dysfunction in younger men is not only influenced by physical health but also closely linked to psychosocial factors such as low income and depression. Further longitudinal research and multidisciplinary approaches are required to develop comprehensive targeted interventions for sexual dysfunction in young men, with an emphasis on mental health and socioeconomic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.