ArticleBMJ open2025
Outcomes of pulmonary embolism in patients with psychiatric disorders: a nationwide analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition with significant morbidity and mortality. The relationship between psychiatric disorders and PE outcomes is complex and not well understood. This study aimed to determine the impact of psychiatric disorders on PE outcomes by comparing patients with and without these conditions.
methodsUsing the National Inpatient Sample database, we analysed 725 725 adult patients hospitalised with PE between 2016 and 2019. Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of psychiatric disorders. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine associations between psychiatric disorders and in-hospital outcomes, adjusting for baseline differences.
resultsOf the patients studied, 26.6% had psychiatric disorders. These patients were younger (59.80 vs 63.91 years, p<0.001), more likely to be female (60.7% vs 48.8%, p<0.001), and had higher rates of smoking and obesity but lower rates of diabetes and atrial fibrillation. After adjustment, patients with psychiatric disorders were less likely to undergo systemic thrombolysis (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.83, 95% CI: 0.80 to 0.85, p<0.001), catheter-directed interventions and placement of inferior vena cava filters (aOR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88 to 0.92, p<0.001). These patients had lower odds of all-cause mortality (aOR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.84, p<0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (aOR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.89, p<0.001), with no significant difference in major bleeding risk (aOR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.05, p=0.553).
conclusionsPsychiatric disorders are associated with distinct management and outcomes in PE. Recognising these unique characteristics may help optimise care for this population; further research is needed to clarify the best management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.