ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2026
Screening for pulmonary hypertension in preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: when, how often and does it matter?
Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Echocardiographic Detection of Pulmonary Hypertension and Right Ventricular Failure in Infants with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Survey of the BPD Collaborative.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Early multi-system physiological biomarkers of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: a matched case-control study based on bedside monitoring.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveBronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) associated pulmonary hypertension (BPD-PH) is the most severe endotype of BPD; there is insufficient evidence to support the optimal screening strategy in at-risk infants. We hypothesised that serial echocardiography throughout hospitalisation would improve PH detection with increased negative predictive value (NPV) beyond 36 week's postmenstrual age (PMA). STUDY
designThis was a single centre cohort study conducted between 2017 and 2023. In infants with BPD-PH, all echocardiograms preceding a diagnostic echocardiogram were included and considered false negatives for prediction of later PH. In infants with BPD alone, all echocardiograms were included and were considered true negatives. These indices were then used to estimate the sensitivity and NPV of echocardiographic screening for PH. In addition, we compared the performance of four different potential echocardiographic screening approaches on the ability to identify infants with BPD-PH.
resultsData from 394 infants were available for this analysis of whom 258 had BPD alone and 136 had BPD-PH. 2542 echocardiograms were used in estimates of diagnostic accuracy. The highest NPVs occurred with echocardiographic screening starting at 36 weeks' and continuing monthly until discharge. Detection of BPD-PH among infants with BPD differed by screening strategy: 34.5% for comprehensive screening, 20.0% for early screening, 15.0% for singular screening and 30.7% for late screening (p<0.05).
conclusionsWhile the diagnostic accuracy of echocardiographic screening increases at and beyond 36 weeks' PMA, obtaining a singular echocardiogram may be an insufficient screening strategy for the detection of BPD-PH in at-risk infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.