Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40913094›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026

Towards causal inference-based antidepressant selection with brain and blood biomarkers.

Milica Barac, Caroline W Grant, Russell Toll, Thomas Carmody, Abu Minhajuddin, Cherise Chin Fatt, Jane A Foster, Paul E Croarkin, William V Bobo, Manish K Jha and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Milica BaracDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2266-5953
Caroline W GrantDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9342-2138
Russell TollCenter for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Thomas CarmodyCenter for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Abu MinhajuddinCenter for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Cherise Chin FattCenter for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5080-6799
Jane A FosterCenter for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-4705
Paul E CroarkinDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6843-6503
William V BoboDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5674-3079
Manish K JhaCenter for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2764-2391
Arjun P AthreyaDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. athreya.arjun@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9764-1768
Madhukar H TrivediCenter for Depression Research and Clinical Care, Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute and the Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. Madhukar.Trivedi@utsouthwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2983-1110

Funding

Establishing Moderators/Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response- Clinical CareU01MH092221 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TRIVEDI, MADHUKAR H. · 2010 to 2015
$9.7M
Elucidating the Neurocircuitry of Irritability with Ultra-High-Field Neuroimaging to Identify Novel Therapeutic TargetsK23MH126202 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JHA, MANISH KUMAR · 2021 to 2025
$918k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH126202NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH092221U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) K23MH126202U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) U01MH092221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report sought to employ multi-modal integration of pre-treatment brain (electroencephalogram, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging) and blood (immune and metabolic) biomarkers to facilitate causal inference-based treatment selection by virtue of establishing predictability of remission to multi-stage antidepressant treatment. Data from two stages of pharmacotherapy in the 'Establishing Moderators and Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response for Clinical Care for Depression' (EMBARC) study from participants with both brain and blood biomarkers were included (N = 197). Participants were initially randomized to sertraline or placebo (Stage 1), and depending on clinical response at week-8, their therapy in Stage 2 was either maintained or switched (to sertraline, if a non-responder to placebo, or to bupropion, if a non-responder to sertraline). Three readily accessible clinical features combined with 15 multi-modal features associated with baseline depression severity predicted stage 2 remission with an AUC of 0.74, 0.71, and 0.73 for sertraline, bupropion, and placebo treatment respectively. Propensity score-matching (causal inference) was conducted across Stage 2 treatment arms, and the same features were used to build an unsupervised model to produce the probability of remission to the given Stage 2 treatment (as factual outcome), as well as the alternative treatment not given (as counter factual). While the accuracy of observed outcomes across treatment arms was 82%, the accuracies of predicted counterfactual (unobserved) outcomes warrant future prospective studies. 16 weeks and associated biomarker-based prediction of counterfactuals suggest that the selected markers are highly sensitive features for guiding antidepressant treatment selection.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsBrainMajor Depressive DisorderAdultBiomarkersBupropionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSertralineTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsBiomarkersBupropionSertraline

Identifiers

PMID40913094
PMCPMC12823655

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.