ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Unsupervised Learning Analysis of Triglycerides, Inflammation, Cholesterol, and the Risks of Incident Cardiovascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes in the Women's Health Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00000479 (Women's Health Study of Low-dose Aspirin and Vitamin E in Apparently Healthy Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Women's Health Study of Low-dose Aspirin and Vitamin E in Apparently Healthy Women
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stratification of Pro-Atherogenic Phenotypes in Prediabetes Using Machine Learning.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraditional cardiovascular risk assessment entails investigator-defined exposure levels and individual risk markers in multivariable analysis. We sought to determine whether an alternative unbiased learning analysis might provide further insights into vascular risk.
methodsWe conducted an unsupervised learning (k-means cluster) analysis in the Women's Health Study (N=26 443) using baseline levels of triglycerides, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to form novel exposures. We then evaluated cluster-based risk of incident coronary, cerebrovascular, and limb events using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox models, followed by comparison with established clinical biomarker thresholds. Finally, we illustrated clinical applicability to a nonvascular outcome (type 2 diabetes).
resultsFour clusters emerged and were named according to aggregate biomarker profiles: Cluster 1 ("healthy," n=12 101), cluster 2 ("hypercholesterolemic," n=7424), cluster 3 ("inflammatory," n=5056), and cluster 4 ("triglyceride-rich," n=1862). Triglyceride-rich cluster identity conferred the highest risk of future cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [HR
conclusionsUnsupervised learning analyses demonstrated associations that may be useful when refining cardiovascular risk and may inform atherosclerosis development in healthy individuals better than traditional classification methods. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00000479.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.