Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40913945›Full record

ReviewInfant behavior & development2025

What have we learned about infant visual attention in the first 25 years of the 21st century?

Brianna K Hunter, Erim Kızıldere, Shannon M Klotz, Christian M Nelson, Julie Markant, Lisa M Oakes

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Infant behavior & development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brianna K HunterCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, USA. Electronic address: bkhunter@ucdavis.edu.
Erim KızıldereCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, USA.
Shannon M KlotzCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, USA.
Christian M NelsonCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, USA.
Julie MarkantDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, USA.
Lisa M OakesCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, USA.

Funding

The development of visual behavior in infancyR01EY030127 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LISA M OAKES · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
Longitudinal investigation of endogenous and social-motivational predictors of infants' attention to caregiversR01HD108325 · NICHD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI Julie Christina Markant · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
Eye tracking and computational approaches to understand the roles of maturation and experience in infant lookingF32EY034017 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HUNTER, BRIANNA KEENAN · 2023 to 2025
$230k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY034017NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030127NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD108325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the beginning of the twenty-first century, the primary view of infant visual attention development focused on a transition across the first postnatal year from being stimulus-driven to goal-driven, reflecting a broader shift from subcortical to cortical control. This perspective was supported by decades of infant looking-time studies. However, our understanding of infant attention has significantly evolved over the past 25 years, shaped by both theoretical advancements and new technological and methodological tools. Researchers now understand that attention development reflects multiple interacting systems that have cascading effects across time. The availability of infant-suitable eye-tracking methods have allowed researchers to consider multiple aspects of attention by precisely measuring when and where infants look, emerging quantitative models of stimulus saliency and computational models of the visual system have deepened our understanding of bottom-up and top-down influences on infant attention, and new methods to evaluate infants' egocentric views have allowed researchers to measure attention in naturalistic contexts. Thus, these innovations allowed us to address questions that were unthinkable 25 years ago. Here, we discuss how these advances have transformed our understanding of infant attention development and outline key directions for future research, paving the way for even more exciting discoveries in the next 25 years.

Indexed as

AttentionChild DevelopmentVisual PerceptionEye-Tracking TechnologyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInfantAttention developmentComputational toolsEgocentric viewsEye-trackingVisual attention

Identifiers

PMID40913945
PMCPMC12805935

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.