Evidence mapPaperPMID 40915646Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025

A Scoping Review of Health-Related Citizen Science Projects Involving Indigenous Peoples in Australia and Internationally.

Josephine Y Chau, John Hunter, Josephine D Gwynn, Ms Putu Novi Arfirsta Dharmayani, Connie Henson, Briellyn Ludlow, John C Skinner, Kylie Gwynne, Boe Rambaldini

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A Scoping Review of Health-Related Citizen Science Projects Involving Indigenous Peoples in Australia and Internationally.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Josephine Y ChauDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6261-2545
John HunterFaculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia.
Josephine D GwynnSydney School of Health Sciences and Charles Perkins Centre Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8760-0786
Ms Putu Novi Arfirsta DharmayaniDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8227-1127
Connie HensonDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7920-9821
Briellyn LudlowDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia.
John C SkinnerDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia.
Kylie GwynneDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia.
Boe RambaldiniDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedCitizen science, an approach to health promotion that involves public participation and collaboration, has been posited as a promising approach to reach diverse or marginalised populations. This scoping review aims to explore the involvement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders and other First Nations and Indigenous peoples internationally in citizen science in health-related studies. While current health promotion in Indigenous communities is already strongly embedded in participatory approaches, we sought to examine whether citizen science methodologies have been used in health promotion and see what it could add.

methodsWe searched three databases for self-identified citizen science studies on health-related topics in the peer-reviewed literature using the term 'citizen science' combined with search terms relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders and global Indigenous populations. We recorded data about project characteristics and the citizen science approach used and appraised the cultural engagement quality of studies included.

resultsEleven articles were included for full-text review. Included studies focused on a range of health-related topics, including environmental issues, physical health, food security, and youth mental health. Six studies (55%) adopted a co-created citizen science approach in which citizen scientists had input in key project phases and activities as collaborators and partners. The remaining studies took contributory (27%) or collaborative (9%) approaches, while no studies were citizen-led. The cultural engagement quality of included citizen science projects was positive overall, although there were areas for improvement, specifically having clear Indigenous research leadership and governance, and transparent agreements on rights to cultural and intellectual property arising from the research.

conclusionCitizen science projects focusing on health-related issues among Indigenous peoples and communities are relatively few. The potential of this approach to enrich current community-based participatory or co-design approaches to health promotion among Indigenous communities remains to be determined. SO WHAT?: Future citizen science projects involving Indigenous people and communities should prioritise and support Indigenous-led citizen science approaches where communities initiate, lead, and govern research processes. Cultural engagement quality could be improved, particularly in relation to having Indigenous-led research governance, and rights of access to and protections of Indigenous intellectual and cultural property.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceCommunity ParticipationHealth PromotionHealth Services, IndigenousIndigenous PeoplesAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansaboriginal and torres strait islander peoplescitizen sciencehealth promotionindigenous peoplesreview

Identifiers

PMID40915646
PMCPMC12414621

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.