ArticleNutrition journal2025
Diet-microbiome synergy: unraveling the combined impact on frailty through interactions and mediation.
Article in Nutrition journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioinformatics Strategy for 16s and 23s rRNA Metabarcoding Data.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Article
- Masticatory function and frailty: insights from NHANES and CHARLS.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The Oral Microbiome Is a Population-Scale Readout of the Exposome, Age, and Systemic Health.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Diet-Oral Microbiota Interactions and Salivary Biomarkers of Nutritional Health: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Personalized Nutrition Through the Gut Microbiome in Metabolic Syndrome and Related Comorbidities.Nutrients · 2026Review
- The microbiome-gut-brain axis: a new perspective on the pathogenesis and intervention of frailty.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study analyzed data from the US population to examine how oral microbiome diversity and diet quality individually and synergistically affect frailty.
methodsThis study included 6,283 participants aged 20 years or older from the 2009-2010 and 2011-2012 NHANES cycles. A frailty index (FI) consisting of 36 items was developed, with items related to nutritional status excluded. The diversity of the oral microbiome was assessed using α-diversity, including observed ASVs, the Shannon-Weiner index, Faith's phylogenetic diversity (PD), and the Simpson index. Dietary quality was assessed using Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII), Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), Mediterranean Diet Score (MED), and Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI). Multivariable logistic models were employed to examine the separate and combined associations of oral microbiome diversity and four dietary quality scores with FI, with interaction effects were explored. Several subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of our findings. Furthermore, the mediation analysis was used to explore oral microbiome diversity as a mediator in the relationship between dietary scores and FI.
resultsBoth oral microbiome diversity and dietary quality scores showed significant individual associations with FI. Jointly, those in the highest tertile of oral microbiome diversity and the lowest tertile of DII had lower FI [β
conclusionThis study demonstrates that a high-quality diet and greater α-diversity of oral microbiota are significantly associated with a reduced risk of frailty. Notably, the interaction between DII and the diversity of the oral microbiota exerts a particularly substantial influence on frailty risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.