Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40916423›Full record

ReviewRenal failure2025

Large language models in nephrology: applications and challenges in chronic kidney disease management.

Yongzheng Hu, Jianping Liu, Wei Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Renal failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yongzheng HuDepartment of Nephrology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Jianping LiuDepartment of medical administration, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, China.
Wei JiangDepartment of Nephrology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) represent a transformative advance in artificial intelligence, with growing potential to impact chronic kidney disease (CKD) management. CKD is a complex, highly prevalent condition requiring multifaceted care and substantial patient engagement. Recent developments in LLMs-including conversational AI, multimodal integration, and autonomous agents-offer novel opportunities to enhance patient education, streamline clinical documentation, and support decision-making across nephrology practice. Early reports suggest that LLMs can improve health literacy, facilitate adherence to complex treatment regimens, and reduce administrative burdens for clinicians. However, the rapid deployment of these technologies raises important challenges, including patient privacy, data security, model accuracy, algorithmic bias, and ethical accountability. Moreover, real-world evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of LLMs in nephrology remains limited. Addressing these challenges will require rigorous validation, robust regulatory frameworks, and ongoing collaboration between clinicians, AI developers, and patients. As LLMs continue to evolve, future efforts should focus on the development of nephrology-specific models, prospective clinical trials, and strategies to ensure equitable and transparent implementation. If appropriately integrated, LLMs have the potential to reshape the landscape of CKD care and education, improving outcomes for patients and supporting the nephrology workforce in an era of increasing complexity.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNephrologyRenal Insufficiency, ChronicDisease ManagementHealth LiteracyHumansLanguageLarge Language ModelsPatient Education as Topicartificial intelligence (AI)CKDclinical decision supportdigital healthLarge language models (LLMs)

Identifiers

PMID40916423
PMCPMC12418797

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.