Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40916554›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

Altered Reward Processing in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Insights From Active and Observational Learning.

Julian Vahedi, Armin Bahic, Irini Chaliani, Leonhard Schilbach, Burkhard Ciupka-Schön, Christian Bellebaum, Reinhard Pietrowsky, Jutta Peterburs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julian VahediFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-5333-4176
Armin BahicClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy/LVR-Clinic Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Irini ChalianiClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy/LVR-Clinic Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Leonhard SchilbachClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy/LVR-Clinic Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Burkhard Ciupka-SchönFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christian BellebaumFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Reinhard PietrowskyFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jutta PeterbursDepartment of Human Medicine, Institute for Systems Medicine, MSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 438203225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been associated with altered performance monitoring, reflected in enhanced amplitudes of the error-related negativity in the event-related potential. However, this is not specific to OCD, as overactive error processing is also evident in anxiety. Although similar neural mechanisms have been proposed for error and feedback processing, it remains unclear whether the processing of errors as indexed by external feedback, reflected in the feedback-related negativity (FRN), is altered in OCD. Likewise, it is currently unknown whether performance monitoring in OCD differs between learning from self-performed and observed outcomes. The present study compared OCD patients (n = 27) with healthy controls (HCs; n = 27) and patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD; n = 29) in an active and observational variant of a probabilistic feedback learning task while EEG was recorded. Compared to HCs, OCD patients showed generally impaired task performance across both active and observational learning, as well as more indecisive choice behavior. This was accompanied by generally more positive amplitudes of the FRN, with enhanced valence coding for active compared to observational learning, driven by more positive FRN amplitudes for wins. However, no differences were found for losses. Overall, these results suggest deficient reward-rather than punishment-processing in OCD. Similar performance monitoring alterations in OCD and SAD imply reliance on shared, disorder-general mechanisms. Possible candidates for these mechanisms, such as intolerance of uncertainty, pessimism, and depressiveness are discussed.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsFeedback, PsychologicalLearningObsessive-Compulsive DisorderPhobia, SocialPsychomotor PerformanceRewardAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultagencyFRN/RewPlearningobsessive–compulsive disorderperformance monitoringprediction error

Identifiers

PMID40916554
PMCPMC12415511

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.