ArticleJournal of obesity & metabolic syndrome2025
Association between Relative Skeletal Muscle Mass and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Development in a Community-Based Population.
Article in Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond Body Mass Index: Toward a Focus on Body Composition and Function.Journal of obesity & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study explores how relative skeletal muscle mass is associated with the development of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and the remission of baseline MASLD in a community-based population cohort. Methods: The study included 1,544 participants with an average age of 58 years. All participants underwent baseline and follow-up assessments in 2015 or 2016. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass was measured using an automatic bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and total skeletal muscle mass was calculated using the BIA equation. Relative skeletal muscle mass was evaluated in two ways: divided by weight and divided by visceral fat area (VFA). Liver fat content was assessed using ultrasonography, and the NAFLD fibrosis score was calculated to quantify the degree of liver fibrosis. Results: During a median follow-up of 2.1 years, each one-standard deviation increase in relative total skeletal muscle mass was associated with a decreased risk of MASLD incidence among males (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 0.74, adjusted for weight; and HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.42, adjusted for VFA) and females (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.83, adjusted for weight; and HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.70, adjusted for VFA). In both sexes, the increase in relative appendicular skeletal muscle mass was also associated with a reduced MASLD risk. We found statistically significant inverse associations between relative skeletal muscle mass and both liver fat content and liver fibrosis. Conclusion: Low relative muscle mass is associated with an increased risk of MASLD incidence and persistence. Therefore, increasing skeletal muscle mass over time might aid in the prevention and management of MASLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.