ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2025
Genomic Characterisation of Limosilactobacillus fermentum CRL2085 Unveiling Probiotic Traits for Application in Cattle Feed.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metagenomic Insights into Microbial Community Succession and its Functional Changes during Natural Fermentation of Food Waste.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Genomic Characterisation of Limosilactobacillus fermentum CRL2085 Unveiling Probiotic Traits for Application in Cattle Feed.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Limosilactobacillus fermentum CRL2085, isolated from feedlot cattle rations, displayed high efficiency as a probiotic when administered to animals. A comprehensive genomic analysis was performed to elucidate the genetic basis underlying its probiotic potential. Fifteen genomic islands and CRISPR-Cas elements were identified in its genome. Pan-genomic analysis highlighted the dynamic evolution of this species, and clustering based on the nucleotide genomic similarity only partially correlated with the source of isolation or the geographic origin of the strains. Several genes known to confer probiotic properties were identified, including those related to adhesion, resistance to acidic pH and bile salts, tolerance to oxidative stress, metabolism/transport of sugars and other compounds, and genes for exopolysaccharide biosynthesis. In silico analysis of antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence determinants confirmed the safety of this strain. Moreover, genes related to B-group vitamins biosynthesis and feruloyl esterase hydrolase were also found, showing the nutritional contribution of the strain, which also showed moderate adhesion capability, exopolysaccharide production when grown with sucrose, and the capacity to metabolise 42 out of 95 carbon substrates tested. This data provides the genetic basis for deciphering the mechanisms beyond the benefits demonstrated by its use during cattle intensive raising and confirms its promising role as a probiotic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.