ReviewFood chemistry: X2025
Harnessing essential oils for sustainable food preservatives: Chemical composition, mechanisms, applications, and safety insights.
Review in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combating Campylobacter Resistance in Moroccan Poultry Using Essential Oil-Ciprofloxacin Combination.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-fabricated thyme essential oil nanoemulsions stabilized by clean-label emulsifiers: Physicochemical properties, antibacterial activity, and food decontamination applications.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Nano-Enabled Advances in Tea Tree Essential Oil (Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biocidal, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activities of essential oils extracted from Angelica spp. cultivated on contaminated soils.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Essential oils (EOs) are secondary metabolites of plants, made up of a wide range of aromatic volatile compounds found in different concentrations. These essential oil components (EOCs) are widely recognized for their diverse biological activities, including antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant properties, among others. Consequently, EOs have garnered significant interest across various industries, such as pharmaceutical, agri-food, and perfumery. In the food sector, their bioactive properties are mainly utilized to combat foodborne microorganisms and retarding oxidative deterioration of products, which helps extend food shelf life, improve sensory qualities, and boost consumer safety. However, these aromatic molecules are known for their instability under external stress as well as their toxicity, which can range from safe at low doses to very toxic at higher concentrations. To address this limitation, encapsulation technology has emerged as an effective strategy for incorporating EOs into wall materials, thereby improving their molecular stability and effectiveness. This method not only enhances sensory acceptance but also, in some cases, reduces toxicity. In this context, this review critically highlights and examines the potential and limitations of EOs and EOCs for food industry applications. It synthesizes current research on the chemical compositions of EOs and assesses their antibacterial, antifungal, and antioxidant effectiveness when used in both free and encapsulated forms. It presents a summary of the current state of knowledge on the interactions between EOCs and the food matrix, elucidating how these interactions affect the biological efficacy of these components. Furthermore, the analysis incorporates the effects of free versus encapsulated forms on sensory attributes and safety, thereby offering a comprehensive and contemporary perspective on the practical implementation of EOs in food systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.