Evidence mapPaperPMID 40917357Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Global prevalence of insulin resistance in the adult population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jhosmer Ballena-Caicedo, Fiorella E Zuzunaga-Montoya, Joan A Loayza-Castro, Juan Carlos Bustamante-Rodríguez, Luisa Erika Milagros Vásquez Romero, Rafael Tapia-Limonchi, Carmen Inés Gutierrez De Carrillo, Víctor Juan Vera-Ponce

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jhosmer Ballena-CaicedoInstituto de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Chachapoyas, Peru.
Fiorella E Zuzunaga-MontoyaUnidad de Posgrado, Universidad Continental, Lima, Peru.
Joan A Loayza-CastroInstituto de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Chachapoyas, Peru.
Juan Carlos Bustamante-RodríguezInstituto de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Chachapoyas, Peru.
Luisa Erika Milagros Vásquez RomeroInstituto de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Chachapoyas, Peru.
Rafael Tapia-LimonchiInstituto de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Chachapoyas, Peru.
Carmen Inés Gutierrez De CarrilloInstituto de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Chachapoyas, Peru.
Víctor Juan Vera-PonceInstituto de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales, Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Chachapoyas, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the global prevalence of IR, evaluating differences according to study designs and population characteristics. Methodology: A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted. The search encompassed MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE, including observational studies that employed the HOMA-IR index to estimate IR and published adult prevalence data. Articles without clear IR definitions or with highly specific populations were excluded. The meta-analysis applied a random-effects model with proportion transformation (Freeman-Tukey), assessing heterogeneity with I² and Cochran's Q test. Additionally, a meta-regression by publication year was conducted. Results: Eighty-seven studies were included, with 235,148 participants. The pooled prevalence of IR was estimated at 26.53% (95% CI: 24.10-29.03; I²=99%), with no statistically significant differences when comparing probabilistic versus non-probabilistic sampling or when stratifying by sex. The meta-regression revealed no clear variations according to publication year or other explored factors. Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrates that IR reaches a global prevalence of 26.53%, with estimated differences between 26% and 30% across different populations and geographical regions. Despite the diversity in cut-off points employed for HOMA-IR, no statistically significant differences were observed when comparing sampling designs or stratifying by sex. Furthermore, no clear trend related to publication year was evidenced.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceAdultGlobal HealthHumansPrevalenceinsulin resistancemeta-analysisprevalencepublic healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40917357
PMCPMC12411212

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.