ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Effectiveness of Active Cycle of Breathing Technique in Improving Physiological and Functional Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sex Differences in the Effects of Perioperative Rehabilitation on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Cardiac Valve Surgery: A Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the PORT Randomized Trial.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common surgical approach for advanced coronary artery disease unresponsive to conservative or percutaneous treatments. Despite its benefits in symptom relief and long-term outcomes, CABG is associated with notable postoperative respiratory complications. As such, respiratory physiotherapy plays a crucial role in recovery. The active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT) is a non-invasive, evidence-based method that promotes lung ventilation, secretion clearance, and respiratory function. This review aimed to describe the effectiveness of the ACBT in enhancing physiological and functional outcomes following CABG surgery. A review of PubMed and Google Scholar studies was conducted, with relevant articles analyzed for study design, patient profiles, intervention protocols, and clinical outcomes. Fifteen articles were included, encompassing studies on pulmonary complications following CABG, dosage and application of ACBT, its preventive role in postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), and its effects on respiratory and functional outcomes. The results of this review are expected to enhance clinicians' insight into selecting physical therapy to prevent PPCs. Pulmonary complications, including atelectasis and impaired gas exchange, are common after CABG and are primarily associated with anesthesia, surgical trauma, systemic inflammatory response, and impaired airway clearance. ACBT, consisting of breathing control, thoracic expansion, and forced expiration techniques, is a structured, non-invasive intervention designed to mobilize secretions and improve ventilation. It is typically applied 2-3 times per day over 2-5 days and often combined with incentive spirometry and conventional chest physiotherapy. The reviewed studies suggest that ACBT enhances oxygenation, improves lung volumes, and increases functional capacity. Additionally, ACBT helps reduce postoperative pain and dyspnea, contributing to overall recovery without reported adverse events. To conclude, ACBT is a safe, practical, and effective physiotherapeutic approach to support postoperative pulmonary recovery in CABG patients. Further well-designed trials are needed to validate and standardize its clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.