Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40917731›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2025

Telehealth Approach in Breast Cancer Care: A Systematic Review of Models and Outcomes.

Yanny Trisyani, Aan Nuraeni, Anastasia Anna, Ayu Prawesti Priambodo, Firman Sugiharto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yanny TrisyaniDepartment of Critical Care and Emergency Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-4862-4950
Aan NuraeniDepartment of Critical Care and Emergency Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-1466-7394
Anastasia AnnaDepartment of Critical Care and Emergency Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.
Ayu Prawesti PriambodoDepartment of Critical Care and Emergency Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-8611-824X
Firman SugihartoDoctoral Program, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-4223-9573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer remains the most prevalent malignancy among women worldwide and represents a significant global health burden. Advances in treatment have increased survivorship, but many patients continue to experience persistent physical and psychosocial challenges. Telehealth has emerged as a promising approach to delivering continuous, patient-centered care, particularly during the treatment and survivorship phases. Despite its growing application, there is a lack of synthesized evidence regarding the diverse models, content, and clinical benefits of telehealth interventions in breast cancer care. Purpose: This systematic review aimed to identify the effectiveness of telehealth on clinical outcomes in breast cancer patients. Methods: This review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using relevant keywords across PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Taylor & Francis, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies were RCTs involving telehealth interventions and targeting adult breast cancer patients. Multiple reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize extracted data. Results: 24 RCTs from 10 countries met the inclusion criteria, with sample sizes ranging from 42 to 454 participants. The studies featured various telehealth models, including psychoeducational, cognitive-behavioral, chronic disease, transtheoritical, behavioural theory, lifestyle management, and nurse-led symptom monitoring model. Delivery methods included telephone calls, web-internet-based platforms, and smartphone applications. Typical intervention contents included education, psychological support, symptom tracking, self-management, empowerment, and exercise guidance. Telehealth interventions have demonstrated positive outcomes, including improvements in quality of life, mood, adherence, self-management skills, self esteem, sleep quality, coping strategy, and also reductions in depression, anxiety,and fatigue. Conclusion: This review highlights the significant role of telehealth as a complementary and integrative component of breast cancer care. It can support patients throughout treatment and survivorship, while improving accessibility and promoting patient-centered outcomes.

Indexed as

breast cancerpatient outcomesquality of liferemote caretelehealthtelenursing

Identifiers

PMID40917731
PMCPMC12409339

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.