Observational studyGlobal heart2025
Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease - Provision, Attendance, and Outcomes: Results from the INTERASPIRE Survey from Fourteen Countries Across Six WHO Regions.
Observational study in Global heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac Rehabilitation-Current Paradigms and Challenges Across the Cardiovascular Continuum.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- World Heart Federation Roadmap on cardiac rehabilitation: a pathway to lifelong cardiovascular health.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Preferences and user experience of wearable devices in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and mixed-methods synthesis protocol.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Cardiac Rehabilitation in 2026: Bridging Guideline Mandates, Patient Realities and Emerging Innovations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Effectiveness and Current Challenges of Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Narrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Implementation and Strategies to Support Adoption of the World Heart Federation Roadmap on Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Pathway to Improve Lifelong Cardiovascular Health.Global heart · 2026Review
- The Impact of Selected Risk Factors on the Frequency of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Part I.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiac rehabilitation for TAVR patients: mechanisms, current status, and future directions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: INTERASPIRE was an observational study of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) from 88 hospitals in 14 countries across all six WHO regions. The objective was to describe the proportions of patients referred to and attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes and to compare lifestyle and risk factor target achievement according to participation in a CR programme. Methods: Patients 18-80 years of age, with a first or recurrent coronary hospitalisation (acute coronary syndrome and/or revascularisation procedure) were identified and invited to an interview and examination, between six months and two years after the index hospitalisation. Results: Overall, 4,548 (21.1% female) patients were interviewed a median of 1.05 (interquartile range 0.76-1.45) years after hospitalization. Of those patients, 34.4% reported having been advised to participate in a CR programme, though the percentage varied widely by country, from 4.0% in Kenya to 69.6% in Poland. Among patients advised to participate in CR, 57.1% participated in ≥50% of all sessions, 15.4% participated in <50% of the sessions, and 27.4% did not participate at all. Only 19.6% of all patients recruited to the study attended ≥50% of sessions. Content of programmes reported by patients also varied enormously between countries. Low education level, elective PCI, or unstable angina as recruiting events were associated with lower attendance rates. Attendance at ≥50% of all CR sessions was associated with a lower prevalence of persistent smoking and physical inactivity, better control of blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol, and a higher use of cardioprotective medications. Conclusions: INTERASPIRE provides a standardised international picture of CR provision and attendance in patients with CHD. Despite CR being a Class 1 recommendation in all international guidelines, only one third of CHD patients reported being advised to attend any form of CR and just one in five patients attended 50% of the sessions, with striking heterogeneity between regions and countries. National cardiology societies should advocate to their governments for urgent investment in standardised CR services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.