ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Effect of electroacupuncture on restoration of traumatic vertebral compression fracture: two case studies and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) cause severe pain and functional impairments. Conventional treatments, including medication and vertebral augmentation, have limited efficacy and safety. Electroacupuncture (EA), which combines acupuncture with electrical stimulation, is a promising but under-studied approach for VCF management. This case report with a literature review presents two cases of traumatic VCF that were successfully treated with EA as well as a literature review on this topic. Two female patients with acute VCFs were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) at baseline and at 2 and 4 weeks post-treatment. EA was applied to the deep paraspinal muscles using stainless steel needles (0.30 × 60 mm) inserted up to 50 mm, with 4-Hz, 1-2-mA stimulation for 20 min, twice daily. Adjunctive treatments included analgesics, herbal medicines, and thermotherapy. A literature review was conducted to determine the efficacy of EA in fracture recovery. Both patients experienced marked pain relief and functional improvements. Their NRS scores decreased from 70 to 40 (patient 1) and 30 (patient 2), ODI scores decreased from ∼85 to 64.4 and 42.2, respectively, and EQ-5D scores improved to 67.7 (patient 1) and 73.0 (patient 2). Early restoration of standing ability and ambulation was also observed. The findings from the literature review suggest that EA may enhance bone healing via callus formation and immune modulation. EA applied to the deep paraspinal muscles may be an effective, minimally invasive treatment for VCF, promoting pain relief and recovery. Further controlled trials are required to confirm the efficacy and mechanism of action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.