ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Overall hemostatic potential as a marker of subclinical hypercoagulability in treated psoriasis patients.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammatory burden and cardiovascular risk stratification across psoriasis severity stages.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Article
- The Dynamics of Blood-Count-Derived Inflammatory Indices in the Course of Systemic Treatment for Psoriasis: A Single Center Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Association between fibrinogen and decline in cardiorespiratory fitness in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing: a large cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Reduced Fibrinolysis Links Obesity to Cardiovascular Risk in Psoriasis Independently of Inflammation: A Novel Mechanistic Pathway.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
- Psychological distress in young adults with well-controlled psoriasis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psoriasis is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, possibly mediated by inflammation-induced hemostatic dysregulation and hypercoagulability. However, these changes are often difficult to detect with conventional markers. Objectives: To assess hypercoagulability in patients with psoriasis using the Overall Hemostatic Potential (OHP) test, a global integrative test for coagulation and fibrinolysis. Methods: We studied 80 psoriasis patients (54 men, 26 women, aged 30-45 years) receiving effective topical or systemic treatments (methotrexate, adalimumab, secukinumab or guselkumab) and compared them with 20 healthy controls. We measured OHP, its components - overall coagulation potential (OCP) and overall fibrinolytic potential (OFP) and selected hemostatic markers (platelet count, mean platelet volume, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, P-selectin, D-dimer and fibrinogen). Results: Psoriasis patients had significantly higher OHP levels, primarily due to decreased OFP, while OCP levels were comparable to the control group - indicating a hypercoagulable state due to impaired fibrinolysis. Other conventional hemostatic markers showed no significant differences. OHP and OFP correlated with residual inflammatory activity, BMI, waist circumference, visceral adiposity and fibrinogen levels, suggesting a relationship between subclinical inflammation, metabolic parameters and hemostatic imbalance. Conclusion: The OHP test reveals a hypercoagulable state in psoriasis patients even in the absence of abnormal standard coagulation markers. OHP could be a practical and sensitive tool to stratify cardiovascular risk in psoriasis, especially in patients with concomitant metabolic disease or persistent inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.