ArticleNature and science of sleep2025
Explainable Machine Learning Assists in Revealing Associations Between Polysomnographic Biomarkers and Incident Type 2 Diabetes in Men.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ACCESS-OSA: a randomized controlled trial for accurate, accessible, and cost-effective screening solutions for obstructive sleep apnoea: study protocol.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) shows bidirectional relationships with polysomnographic measures. However, no studies have searched systematically for novel polysomnographic biomarkers of T2D. We therefore investigated if state-of-the-art explainable machine learning (ML) models could identify new polysomnographic biomarkers predictive of incident T2D. Methods: We applied explainable ML models to longitudinal cohort study data from 536 males who were free of T2D at baseline and identified 52 cases of T2D at follow-up (mean 8.3, range 3.5-10.5 years). Beyond ranking biomarker importance, we explored how the explainable ML model approach can identify novel relationships, assist in hypothesis testing, and provide insights into risk factors. Results: The top five most predictive biomarkers included waist circumference, glucose, and three novel sleep biomarkers: the number of 3% desaturations in non-supine sleep, mean heart rate in supine sleep, and mean hypopnea duration. Explainable machine learning identified a significant association between the number of non-supine desaturation events (threshold of 19 events) and incident T2D (Odds ratio = 2.4 [95% CI 1.2-4.8], P = 0.013). No significant associations were found using continuous or quartiled versions of non-supine desaturation. Additionally, the model provided an individualized risk factor breakdown, supporting a more personalized approach to precision sleep medicine. Conclusion: Explainable ML supports the role of established biomarkers and reveals novel biomarkers of T2D likely to help guide further hypothesis testing and validation of more robust and clinically useful biomarkers. Although further validation is needed, these proof-of-concept data support the benefits of explainable ML in prospective data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.