Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918076›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Utilizing machine learning algorithms for personalized workout recommendations and monitoring: A systematic review on smartwatch-assisted exercise prescription.

Hassan Jubair, Mithela Mehenaz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hassan JubairDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8001-7856
Mithela MehenazDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Varendra University, Rajshahi, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1174-0066

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Smartwatches, equipped with advanced sensors, have become increasingly prominent in health and fitness domains. Their integration with machine learning (ML) algorithms presents novel opportunities for personalized exercise prescription and physiological monitoring. Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, limitations, and practical applications of smartwatch-ML systems in delivering tailored fitness interventions and health tracking. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, five databases (PubMed, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus) were searched for studies published from January 2000 to December 2023. Inclusion criteria required empirical studies involving human participants, the use of smartwatches for exercise monitoring or prescription, and the application of ML algorithms. Forty-nine studies met the eligibility criteria and were synthesized narratively using thematic clustering. Results: The majority of included studies demonstrated high algorithmic performance in activity recognition (>98% accuracy) and vital sign tracking. However, external validity was often limited due to lab-based testing, narrow demographic representation, and lack of standardized evaluation frameworks. Few studies incorporated explainable artificial intelligence, behavioral adaptation, or longitudinal validation. Ethical and regulatory considerations were rarely addressed. Conclusion: Smartwatch-ML integration holds substantial promise for individualized, real-time health support, especially in fitness and rehabilitation. To ensure broader impact and clinical adoption, future research must address generalizability, ethical data governance, interpretability, and interdisciplinary system design.

Indexed as

activity recognitionexercise prescriptionmachine learningpersonalized fitnessphysiological monitoringSmartwatcheswearable health technology

Identifiers

PMID40918076
PMCPMC12411723

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.