Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918079›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Effectiveness of step-count monitoring interventions in increasing physical activity among children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wentao Wang, Cong Huang, Yi Shen, Jing Cheng, Ling Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wentao WangDepartment of Basic Education, Zhejiang Tongji Vocational College of Science and Technology, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-1196
Cong HuangDepartment of Sports and Exercise Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yi ShenDepartment of Basic Education, Zhejiang Tongji Vocational College of Science and Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Jing ChengDepartment of Basic Education, Zhejiang Tongji Vocational College of Science and Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Ling WangDepartment of Sports and Arts, Zhejiang Gongshang University Hangzhou College of Commerce, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of step-count monitoring interventions on objectively measured physical activity-related outcomes in children and adolescents. Methods: This review was designed and conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following five electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library. The search was performed from the date of database inception to December 7, 2024. Meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the pooled effects of the interventions on daily steps, accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), light physical activity (LPA), and sedentary behavior (SB). Results: Thirty-four studies were selected for this meta-analysis. Step-count monitoring interventions could significantly increase daily steps (MD 1588.83 steps/day; 95% CI 1033.94 to 2143.72; Conclusions: Step-count monitoring interventions may be appropriate and effective for increasing total physical activity and reducing SB in children and adolescents. Moreover, these interventions may serve as an optional approach for increasing MVPA in children. We recommend a "less is more" strategy with regard to step-count monitoring interventions for increasing physical activity in children and adolescents.

Indexed as

adolescentschildrenMeta-analysisphysical activitystep-count monitoring interventions

Identifiers

PMID40918079
PMCPMC12409064

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.