ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Efficacy and Safety of Magnetic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Neuropathic Pain; One Year Follow Up of Long-Term Outcomes.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04795635 (A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Axon Therapy for Post-Traumatic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Effectiveness of Axon Therapy for Post-Traumatic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (PTPNP) to Conventional Medical Management (CMM)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of Action of Low-Frequency Pulsed Magnetic Fields in Pain Control.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Magnetic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (mPNS) is an emerging neuromodulation therapy for chronic pain. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of mPNS in combination with CMM in patients with post-traumatic or post-surgical pain. Materials and methods: Safety and Efficacy of Axon Therapy (SEAT) was a prospective, randomized, multi-center study conducted across four clinical sites in the United States with 1 year follow-up. Eligible participants were between 18-75 years old, had chronic neuropathic pain for at least three months, and a baseline visual analog scale (VAS) score of 6 or higher. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either Magnetic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (mPNS) along with their Conventional Medical Management (mPNS+CMM) or CMM alone. Subjects in CMM cohort were allowed to crossover at Day 90. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of subjects with ≥50% reduction of pain intensity at Day 90 without an increase in pain medication. The primary safety endpoint was the proportion of subjects free from therapy-related adverse events at Day 90. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04795635. Results: 90 participants were screened, and 65 met the inclusion criteria to be enrolled (CMM + mPNS 35; CMM: 30). At Day 90, 71% of subjects were considered responders (>50% pain relief) in the CMM + mPNS cohort vs 13% of subjects in the CMM group (p < 0.0001). By the end of the study, 94% of participants were determined to be pain responders in the CMM + mPNS group as well as 69.2% in the Crossover group. The EQ-5D-3L and PGIC responder rates also improved. AEs were considered to be treatment-related in three (8.6%) CMM + mPNS participants, and two (10.5%) Crossover participants. Conclusion: mPNS was well-tolerated and resulted in significant long-term reductions in pain intensity and improvement in patients with chronic neuropathic pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.