Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40918444›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Identification of critical process parameters and quality attributes for bioreactor-based expansion of human MSCs.

Laura Herbst, Bastian Nießing, Robert H Schmitt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura HerbstDepartment Bio-Adaptive production, Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology (FHG), Aachen, Germany.
Bastian NießingDepartment Bio-Adaptive production, Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology (FHG), Aachen, Germany.
Robert H SchmittDepartment Bio-Adaptive production, Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology (FHG), Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have been identified as a promising therapeutic option for osteoarthritis, graft vs. host disease and cardiovascular diseases, among others. For widespread application of these therapies, robust and scaled manufacturing processes are required that reliably yield high amounts of high quality MSCs. One of the primary challenges in MSC manufacturing is achieving robustness, due to the high donor-to-donor and batch-to-batch variability seen in MSC manufacturing. To achieve more consistent manufacturing, standardization of the manufacturing process and analytical methods to determine cell quality and control process parameters will be needed. Traditionally, MSCs are cultivated in two dimensional (2D) systems, such as flasks or plates. However, these systems are limited in their scalability. To enhance volumetric productivity, upscaling may be achieved using agitated bioreactors where the MSCs are grown on microcarriers or other types of scaffolds. In this article, we have reviewed existing publications on the manufacturing of MSCs in agitated bioreactor systems regarding the process conditions used and the quality parameters measured to define more clearly the most relevant cell quality and process parameters. Key cell quality parameters measured are cell number and viability, immunophenotype and differentiation potential, while key process parameters include the cultivation system (cell source, bioreactor type, media composition), physiochemical properties of the media such as pH and dissolved oxygen (DO), as well as nutrient supply. Defining these parameters more clearly will support the development of robust MSC manufacturing processes at scale using improved process control and facilitate the widespread clinical application of MSC-based cell therapies.

Indexed as

bioreactorcritical process parametercritical quality attributesmesenchymal stem cellsquality-by-designstandardization

Identifiers

PMID40918444
PMCPMC12408662

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.