ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Epigenetic regulation of bladder cancer in the context of aging.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global, regional, and national burden of bladder cancer from 1990 to 2021 with projections to 2050: insights from the global burden of disease study and Mendelian randomization analysis.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
- Integration of genetic, proteomic, and transcriptomic data identifies therapeutic targets and prognostic biomarkers in bladder cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is a disease that predominantly affects older adults, with aging playing a critical role in its onset and progression. Age-associated phenomena, including immunosenescence and chronic inflammation, form a pro-tumor milieu, while genomic instability and epigenetic drift further increase cancer risk. The review highlights the dual role of DNA methylation in BC: global hypomethylation can activate transposable elements and oncogenes, whereas focal hypermethylation silences tumor-suppressor genes like CDKN2A, especially detrimental in older tissues that rely on these genes for senescence control. In parallel, frequent mutations in chromatin modifiers (e.g., KDM6A, KMT2D) and overexpression of histone-modifying enzymes (e.g., EZH2) alter the tumor epigenome to promote immune evasion and tumor aggressiveness. At the non-coding RNA level, dysregulated microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in BC contribute to aberrant proliferation, metastatic potential, and immune suppression, with aging-associated declines in miRNA processing further exacerbating these effects. Collectively, the accumulation of epigenetic alterations in older patients appears to facilitate both tumor progression and resistance to therapy. Looking forward, epigenetic biomarkers may improve early detection and risk stratification. Furthermore, "epigenetic therapies," such as DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi), EZH2 inhibitors (EZH2i), or histone deacetylases inhibitors (HDACi), hold promise to restore tumor-suppressor function and enhance immunogenicity, offering an attractive avenue for improving outcomes in older patients with BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.